Based on the DfI consultation documents, below a detailed analysis of active travel and its relationship to the proposed Strangford Lough Crossing (SLC), specifically focusing on Ards & North Down and Newry, Mourne & Down councils.
Definition and Current Mode Comparison:
Per the “Active Travel Delivery Plan Public Consultation November 2024”, active travel is defined as:
“Travelling by physically active means such as walking, wheeling, or cycling” including:
- Walking/wheeling (with mobility aids)
- Cycling (including e-cycles and adapted cycles)
- Other active modes like scooting and skating
Current Travel Pattern Issues:
- Car Dependency:
- 75km/1.5 hour journey required around Strangford Lough vs potential 8-minute crossing (Source: “DfI 2024-0366 – Barry – Response.pdf”)
- Ferry service limitations with operating hours 7:30-23:00 weekdays
- Limited modal options, especially for emergency access
- Environmental Impact:
- Current ferry service costs £3.52m annually to operate (2023/24 figures)
- Associated vessel emissions and maintenance environmental impacts
- Additional vehicle emissions from extended routing
Active Travel Strategy Elements:
The consultation outlines three key connection priorities:
- Connections to local schools
- Connections to public transport
- Connections to town centres
Missing Elements in Current Plans:
- Cross-Lough Integration:
Neither council’s active travel plans (Appendices 2 and 10) include consideration of a fixed crossing, despite:
- Both councils having priority routes aimed at connecting communities
- Significant potential for cross-lough active travel integration
- Strategic Connection Opportunity:
The SLC could provide:
- A 24/7 active travel corridor connecting both shores
- Dedicated cycling and pedestrian facilities
- Integration with proposed priority routes in both council areas
Recommendations:
- Include SLC in Active Travel Framework:
- Incorporate dedicated active travel lanes in bridge design
- Connect to proposed priority routes in both council areas
- Enable safe cycling/walking crossing options
- Environmental Benefits:
- Reduce vehicle emissions through shorter journeys
- Support modal shift to active travel
- Align with decarbonization goals
- Economic Integration:
- Support tourism development through active travel connections
- Enable sustainable commuting options
- Connect education and employment centers
This analysis is supported by the successful Øresund Bridge model referenced in stakeholder correspondence (Source: “SLC – Letter of Response to DfI Private Office 30-9-2024 KTB.pdf”), which demonstrates how major infrastructure can successfully integrate active travel options.
A significant opportunity exists to incorporate the SLC into both councils’ active travel strategies, providing a transformative connection that would support modal shift, reduce emissions, and create new sustainable transport options currently missing from the plans.